Re: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

[Pekka Pietikainen]

On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 10:57:01PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Could you profile it please? Also, what's the context-switch rate?
> > 
> > As far as I can tell, the broadcom mips architecture does not have 
> > profiling support. It does only have some proprietary profiling 
> > registers that nobody wrote kernel support for, yet.
> Well, what does 'vmstat 1' show - how many context switches are 
> there per second on the iperf server? In theory if it's a truly 
> saturated box, there shouldnt be many - just a single iperf task 
Yay, finally something that's measurable in this thread \o/

Gigabit Ethernet iperf on an Atom or so might be something that 
shows similar effects yet is debuggable. Anyone feel like taking a shot?

That beast doing iperf probably ends up making it go quite close to it's
limits (IO, mem bw, cpu). IIRC the routing/bridging performance is
something like 40Mbps (depends a lot on the model, corresponds pretty
well with the Mhz of the beast). 

Maybe not totally unlike what make -j16 does to a 1-4 core box? 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/