Re: [PATCH v2] viafb: 2D engine rewrite (and viafb patches ingeneral)

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Fri,  4 Sep 2009 20:43:52 +0000
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@xxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch is a completly rewritten 2D engine. The engine is no longer
> in a default state but reinitialized every time to allow usage for both
> framebuffers regardless of their settings.
> The whole engine handling is concentrated in a big function which takes
> 16 parameters.

Ouch, that's a lot of parameters.  Might it be better to create a
structure to encapsulate all of those drawing parameters?

On a more general level: is anybody maintaining a tree for patches to
the viafb driver?  I'm going to be doing some work here (writing a
driver for the video capture engine), and there's patches sitting in
Harald's tree and the OLPC tree.  It seems like a central merge point
might be a nice thing to have.

I'd be happy to run such a tree.  I'm really *not* qualified to be
passing judgment on patches to the framebuffer driver at this point,
though, so I'm not sure that I'm the best person for the job.

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/