Re: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Increase granularity ofread_persistent_clock()

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sat Aug 22 2009 - 11:34:14 EST



* Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > FYI, -tip arch-testing found that this commit broke the PowerPC
> > build:
> >
> > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c: In function 'read_persistent_clock':
> > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:788: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
> > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:791: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
> > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/time.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
>
> I overlooked a case in the powerpc version of read_persistent_lock.
> New patch:

the patches are already committed and this patch doesnt apply - mind
sending a delta fix against tip:master:

http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/