Re: +cgroups-add-functionality-to-read-write-lock-clone_thread-forking-per-threadgroup.patch added to -mm tree

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Fri Aug 21 2009 - 06:30:19 EST


On 08/20, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Subject: cgroups: add functionality to read/write lock CLONE_THREAD fork()ing per-threadgroup
> From: Ben Blum <bblum@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add an rwsem that lives in a threadgroup's sighand_struct (next to the
> sighand's atomic count, to piggyback on its cacheline), and two functions
> in kernel/cgroup.c (for now) for easily+safely obtaining and releasing it.

Sorry. Currently I have no time to read these patched. Absolutely :/

But the very first change I noticed outside of cgroups.[ch] looks very wrong,

> +struct sighand_struct *threadgroup_fork_lock(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + struct sighand_struct *sighand;
> + struct task_struct *p;
> +
> + /* tasklist lock protects sighand_struct's disappearance in exit(). */
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + if (likely(tsk->sighand)) {
> + /* simple case - check the thread we were given first */
> + sighand = tsk->sighand;
> + } else {
> + sighand = NULL;
> + /*
> + * tsk is exiting; try to find another thread in the group
> + * whose sighand pointer is still alive.
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, &tsk->thread_group, thread_group) {

If ->sighand == NULL we can't use list_for_each_entry_rcu(->thread_group),
and rcu_read_lock() can't help.

The task was removed from ->thread_group, its ->next points to nowhere.

list_for_rcu(head) can _only_ work if we can trust head->next: it should
point either to "head" (list_empty), or to the valid entry.

Please correct me if I missed something.

Otherwise, please send the changes which touch the process-management
code separately. And please do not forget to CC people who work with
this code ;)

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/