Re: [PATCH 14/17] xfs: Use new syncing helper

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:04:41PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c
> index 7078974..aeb5a39 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c
> @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ write_retry:
>  		xfs_iunlock(xip, iolock);
>  		if (need_i_mutex)
>  			mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> -		error2 = sync_page_range(inode, mapping, pos, ret);
> +		error2 = generic_write_sync(file, pos, ret);

I don't think this is very optimal for XFS.  This first starts an
asynchronous writeout of the range in generic_write_sync,
then calls into ->fsync which waits for all I/O on the file to finish,
then forces the log inside xfs_fsync,  then waits for the range again in
generic_write_sync, and after this code calls into
xfs_write_sync_logforce which forces to log _again_.

We should be fine just doing your new filemap_fdatawrite_range helper
here and let xfs_write_sync_logforce do the work.  Long term we should
just get rid of this stupid submit writes before syncing the iode, then
wait crap which is a pain for all modern filesystems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/