Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driverobjects

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/19/2009 09:40 AM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>    
> > > So if I whip up a virtio-net backend for vbus with a PCI compliant
> > > connector, you are happy?
> > >
> > >        
> > This doesn't improve virtio-net in any way.
> >      
> Any why not?  (Did you notice I said "PCI compliant", i.e. over virtio-pci)
>    

Because virtio-net will have gained nothing that it didn't have before.




> > virtio already supports this model; see lguest and s390.  Transporting
> > virtio over vbus and vbus over something else doesn't gain anything over
> > directly transporting virtio over that something else.
> >      
> This is not what I am advocating.
>
>    

What are you advocating?  As far as I can tell your virtio-vbus 
connector plus the vbus-kvm connector is just that.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/