Re: [PATCH -next] trace_skb: fix build when CONFIG_NET is notenabled

[David Miller]

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:06:54 +0200

> ... but these are the wrong patches, they should be removed or 
> reverted and redone properly.

Given the number of users of net-next-2.6, removal via rebasing is
simply not an option.  The other two posibilities, sure...

> It's not just about keeping kernel/trace/* changes in the tracing 
> tree (which we can relax on-demand given agreement), it's that 
> these patches are also _wrong_ and we cannot relax anything about 
> that.

Why don't we give Neil a chance to review the situation and fix things
up?

If revert is the final decision, that's fine, I'll revert everything.

But in the mean time at least give Neil a chance to read all of your
feedback and coordinate a way to fix things with everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/