Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driverobjects

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/17/2009 06:09 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > We've been through this before I believe.  If you can point out specific
> > differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear
> > (and steal) them though.
> >
> >      
> You sure know how to convince someone to collaborate with you, eh?
>
>    

If I've offended you, I apologize.

> Unforunately, i've answered that question numerous times, but it
> apparently falls on deaf ears.
>    

Well, I'm sorry, I truly don't think I've had that question answered 
with specificity.  I'm really interested in it (out of a selfish desire 
to improve virtio), but the only comment I recall from you was to the 
effect that the virtio rings were better than ioq in terms of cache 
placement.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/