Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] vbus: add a "vbus-proxy" bus model for vbus_driverobjects

[Avi Kivity]

On 08/17/2009 05:16 PM, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > My opinion is that this is a duplication of effort and we'd be better
> > off if everyone contributed to enhancing virtio, which already has
> > widely deployed guest drivers and non-Linux guest support.
> >
> > It may have merit if it is proven that it is technically superior to
> > virtio (and I don't mean some benchmark in some point in time; I mean
> > design wise).  So far I haven't seen any indications that it is.
> >
> >      
>
> The design is very different, so hopefully I can start to convince you
> why it might be interesting.
>    

We've been through this before I believe.  If you can point out specific 
differences that make venet outperform virtio-net I'll be glad to hear 
(and steal) them though.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/