Re: [PATCH 05/12] update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:52:35PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> update FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX to the current number of syscalls
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index bd2c651..7113654 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
>  
>  /* FIXME: I don't want to stay hardcoded */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> -# define FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX     296
> +# define FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX     299
>  #else
> -# define FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX     333
> +# define FTRACE_SYSCALL_MAX     337
>  #endif


I don't remember why we had to use a hardcoded number.
Is there no way to keep being sync with the current number of
syscalls? We dwant to avoid patching the kernel each time we
have a new syscall :-)

  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> -- 
> 1.6.2.5
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/