Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nfsd tree with the nfs tree

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:58:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the nfsd tree got a conflict in
> net/sunrpc/cache.c between commit
> 173912a6add00f4715774dcecf9ee53274c5924c ("SUNRPC: Move procfs-specific
> stuff out of the generic sunrpc cache code") from the nfs tree and commit
> f866a8194f7cbabb9135b98b9ac7d26237b88367 ("sunrpc/cache: rename
> queue_loose to cache_dequeue") from the nfsd tree.

OK, thanks.

Looks like there may be some less trivial conflicts now, though.  Trond,
maybe you could rebase the cache stuff against my latest for-2.6.32?

--b.

> 
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> diff --cc net/sunrpc/cache.c
> index db7720e,d19c075..0000000
> --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> @@@ -884,7 -908,19 +884,7 @@@ static int cache_release(struct inode *
>   
>   
>   
> - static void queue_loose(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
>  -static const struct file_operations cache_file_operations = {
>  -	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>  -	.llseek		= no_llseek,
>  -	.read		= cache_read,
>  -	.write		= cache_write,
>  -	.poll		= cache_poll,
>  -	.ioctl		= cache_ioctl, /* for FIONREAD */
>  -	.open		= cache_open,
>  -	.release	= cache_release,
>  -};
>  -
>  -
> + static void cache_dequeue(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *ch)
>   {
>   	struct cache_queue *cq;
>   	spin_lock(&queue_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/