Re: [Announce] 2.6.31-rc4-rt1

[koniu]

Oh my, sent it with a wrong subject, sorry - the kernel in question i
2.6.31-rc4-rt1:

Hi,

I'm getting a bunch of BUGs, one from Xorg on startup and lots from
jackd. So far they don't seem to carry any ill-effects.

[ Â 15.323439] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:9
[ Â 15.323449] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 2462, name: Xorg
[ Â 15.323457] Pid: 2462, comm: Xorg Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ Â 15.323463] Call Trace:
[ Â 15.323478] Â[<c10262bf>] ? kmap+0x4f/0x60
[ Â 15.323530] Â[<f828f86f>] ? i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl+0x79f/0x8f0 [i915]
[ Â 15.323542] Â[<c10cec1e>] ? _slab_irq_disable+0x3e/0x60
[ Â 15.323592] Â[<f80c400f>] ? drm_gem_handle_create+0x6f/0x90 [drm]
[ Â 15.323602] Â[<c1294ac5>] ? rt_mutex_lock+0x15/0x50
[ Â 15.323646] Â[<f80c26fd>] ? drm_ioctl+0x15d/0x340 [drm]
[ Â 15.323687] Â[<f828f0d0>] ? i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl+0x0/0x8f0 [i915]
[ Â 15.323698] Â[<c116249f>] ? cpumask_any_but+0x1f/0x30
[ Â 15.323706] Â[<c102548c>] ? flush_tlb_page+0x5c/0xc0
[ Â 15.323713] Â[<c1024b02>] ? ptep_set_access_flags+0x42/0x60
[ Â 15.323721] Â[<c1294ac5>] ? rt_mutex_lock+0x15/0x50
[ Â 15.323730] Â[<c10664c6>] ? rt_down+0x16/0x50
[ Â 15.323751] Â[<c10e25af>] ? vfs_ioctl+0x7f/0x90
[ Â 15.323759] Â[<c10e2723>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x73/0x670
[ Â 15.323768] Â[<c10bcb5c>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x51c/0x730
[ Â 15.323778] Â[<c10d5339>] ? vfs_write+0x129/0x190
[ Â 15.323787] Â[<c10e2da4>] ? sys_ioctl+0x84/0x90
[ Â 15.323795] Â[<c1003a8c>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28

... (unrelated) ...

[ Â 68.633271] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: jackd/3322
[ Â 68.633287] caller is __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ Â 68.633295] Pid: 3322, comm: jackd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ Â 68.633301] Call Trace:
[ Â 68.633314] Â[<c116f091>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc1/0xd0
[ Â 68.633323] Â[<c1292b9c>] ? __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ Â 68.633335] Â[<c105ccc4>] ? getnstimeofday+0x54/0x110
[ Â 68.633344] Â[<c116af12>] ? copy_to_user+0x42/0x130
[ Â 68.633353] Â[<c1056220>] ? hrtimer_get_res+0x0/0x30
[ Â 68.633362] Â[<c10515a4>] ? sys_clock_gettime+0x54/0xc0
[ Â 68.633371] Â[<c1003c0a>] ? work_resched+0x5/0x19
[ Â 98.488299] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: jackd/3321
[ Â 98.488315] caller is __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ Â 98.488323] Pid: 3321, comm: jackd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ Â 98.488329] Call Trace:
[ Â 98.488341] Â[<c116f091>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc1/0xd0
[ Â 98.488351] Â[<c1292b9c>] ? __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ Â 98.488361] Â[<c1061089>] ? tick_program_event+0x39/0x50
[ Â 98.488371] Â[<c1040366>] ? wakeup_softirqd+0x16/0x60
[ Â 98.488381] Â[<c1088d44>] ? rcu_irq_exit+0x14/0x90
[ Â 98.488389] Â[<c1041485>] ? irq_exit+0x35/0x80
[ Â 98.488398] Â[<c1017e83>] ? smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x53/0x80
[ Â 98.488408] Â[<c1003c0a>] ? work_resched+0x5/0x19
[ Â108.743612] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: jackd/3322
[ Â108.743629] caller is __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ Â108.743637] Pid: 3322, comm: jackd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ Â108.743643] Call Trace:
[ Â108.743657] Â[<c116f091>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc1/0xd0
[ Â108.743667] Â[<c1292b9c>] ? __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ Â108.743678] Â[<c105ccc4>] ? getnstimeofday+0x54/0x110
[ Â108.743687] Â[<c116af12>] ? copy_to_user+0x42/0x130
[ Â108.743696] Â[<c1056220>] ? hrtimer_get_res+0x0/0x30
[ Â108.743704] Â[<c10515a4>] ? sys_clock_gettime+0x54/0xc0
[ Â108.743714] Â[<c1003c0a>] ? work_resched+0x5/0x19
[ Â172.293274] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: jackd/3322
[ Â172.293292] caller is __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ Â172.293300] Pid: 3322, comm: jackd Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-rt1 #1
[ Â172.293305] Call Trace:
[ Â172.293318] Â[<c116f091>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0xc1/0xd0
[ Â172.293328] Â[<c1292b9c>] ? __schedule+0xc/0xa00
[ Â172.293340] Â[<c105ccc4>] ? getnstimeofday+0x54/0x110
[ Â172.293349] Â[<c116af12>] ? copy_to_user+0x42/0x130
[ Â172.293358] Â[<c1056220>] ? hrtimer_get_res+0x0/0x30
[ Â172.293366] Â[<c10515a4>] ? sys_clock_gettime+0x54/0xc0
[ Â172.293376] Â[<c1003c0a>] ? work_resched+0x5/0x19

... (more of the same) ...

Dunno if that means anything to you but if you need any more info
please CC me as I'm not subscribed.

Cheers,
koniu

Attachment: config
Description: Binary data