Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: Add GPIO enable control to fixed voltageregulator driver

From: Mark Brown
Date: Fri Jul 31 2009 - 13:20:15 EST


On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 07:19:49PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Err... no, it isn't. I reviewed a previous version of the patch but
there were some issues that needed fixing. I've not reviewed this
version.

> static int fixed_voltage_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *dev)
> {
> - return 1;
> + struct fixed_voltage_data *data = rdev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + if (data->gpio)
> + return data->is_enabled;

Please use gpio_is_valid() as Phillip previously suggested. For this
particular use you could simplify the code marginally by just setting
is_enabled at probe() time if there's no GPIO, not that it really
matters.

> + if (data->gpio) {
> + gpio_set_value(data->gpio,
> + data->enable_high ? 1 : 0);

_cansleep(), please, as previously requested.

> + ret = gpio_get_value(config->gpio);

Can this fail? It returns an int...

> + ret = gpio_direction_output(config->gpio, ret);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not configure "
> + "enable GPIO %d direction: %d\n",
> + config->gpio, ret);
> + goto err_gpio;

As previously requested please don't split for log messages text over
lines unless you have to. It makes it easier to find the message from a
kernel log - grep for 'configure enable GPIO' won't match this source
file the way you've written it above.

> + }
> + } else
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Not using GPIO 0 for enable control\n");

Probably better to soldier on and use the GPIO here but either way is
fine; the warning is for the benefit of existing out of tree users to
help them transition gracefully.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/