Re: [PATCH] missing mutex unlock

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 04:57:18AM -0500, Stoyan Gaydarov (sgayda2@xxxxxxxx) wrote:
> This was found using a semantic patch, more info can be found at:
> http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stoyan Gaydarov <sgayda2@xxxxxxxx>

Yup, that's correct.
Ack, thank you.

Andrew, please apply.

> ---
>  drivers/w1/masters/omap_hdq.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/omap_hdq.c b/drivers/w1/masters/omap_hdq.c
> index a7e3b70..0d92969 100644
> --- a/drivers/w1/masters/omap_hdq.c
> +++ b/drivers/w1/masters/omap_hdq.c
> @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static int omap_hdq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	if (hdq_data->hdq_usecount) {
>  		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "removed when use count is not zero\n");
> +		mutex_unlock(&hdq_data->hdq_mutex);
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/