[PATCH 04/26] x86/oprofile: Fix usage of NUM_CONTROLS/NUM_COUNTERS macros

[Robert Richter]

Use the corresponding macros when iterating over counter and control
registers. Since NUM_CONTROLS and NUM_COUNTERS are equal for AMD cpus
the fix is more a cosmetical change.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
index fdbed3a..dcfd450 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_amd.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void op_amd_fill_in_addresses(struct op_msrs * const msrs)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_OPROFILE_EVENT_MULTIPLEX
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_VIRT_COUNTERS; i++) {
-		int hw_counter = i % NUM_CONTROLS;
+		int hw_counter = i % NUM_COUNTERS;
 		if (reserve_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i))
 			msrs->multiplex[i].addr = MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + hw_counter;
 		else
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static void op_amd_shutdown(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
 		if (msrs->counters[i].addr)
 			release_perfctr_nmi(MSR_K7_PERFCTR0 + i);
 	}
-	for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; ++i) {
+	for (i = 0; i < NUM_CONTROLS; ++i) {
 		if (msrs->controls[i].addr)
 			release_evntsel_nmi(MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 + i);
 	}
-- 
1.6.3.3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/