Re: [PATCH] documentation: make it clear that sysfs is optional

[Randy Dunlap]

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:10:33 -0700 Greg KH wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 09:06:42AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > From:	Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH] documentation: make it clear that sysfs is optional
> > 
> > The original text suggested that sysfs is mandatory and always
> > compiled in the kernel.
> 
> But it should be :)

Well, you have the option of making it non-optional.


> Seriously, who turns sysfs off these days, does anyone?  If so, why?

Why is it configurable then?


---
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/