[PATCH] documentation: make it clear that sysfs is optional

[Randy Dunlap]

From:	Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] documentation: make it clear that sysfs is optional

The original text suggested that sysfs is mandatory and always
compiled in the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lgrijincu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-next-20090727.orig/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt
+++ linux-next-20090727/Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ interface. 
 Using sysfs
 ~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-sysfs is always compiled in. You can access it by doing:
+sysfs is always compiled in if CONFIG_SYSFS is defined. You can access
+it by doing:
 
     mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys 
 


---
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/