Re: [Regression] kdesu broken

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (07/25/09 16:02), Frans Pop wrote:
> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:02:48 +0200
> From: Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rjw@xxxxxxx, ray-lk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> 	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> 	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Regression] kdesu broken
> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
> 
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> We don't do regressions. If user space depended on old behavior, we
> >> don't change behavior
> > 
> > I think there are two bugs being confused here. The first kdesu bug
> > isn't the EIO one. It's just busted userspace code that happened to be
> > lucky. 
> > It's also impossible to keep that "luck" going. The other problem is the
> > EIO - which is a bug.
>  
> Just out of curiosity ad for reference.
> Has this issue already been reported to the KDE people? Any links to a bug 
> report or discussions there?
> 

Not yet.

Sergey

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature