Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] perfcounter: Add support for kernel hardware breakpoints

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Frédéric Weisbecker wrote:
> 2009/7/20, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 13:08 -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> This adds the support for kernel hardware breakpoints in perfcounter.
>>> It is added as a new type of software counter and can be defined by
>>> using the counter number 5 and by passsing the address of the
>>> breakpoint to set through the config attribute.
>> This seems to be IP based breakpoints. Are there plans for data based
>> breakpoints as well? In that case we might want to think about the
>> namespace issue, we cannot both call them breakpoint/bp etc.. ;-)
> 
> 
> Nop, by default these breakpoints trigger on READ/WRITE accesses, it's
> meant for data.
> The example in the changelog profiles the bkl accesses, not by tracing
> lock_kernel() or so...but by tracing the kernel_flag spinlock itself.
> 
> So it's the opposite, we may start thinking about naming issues
> against possible future plans
> for IP breakpoint :-)
> 
> But actually for the latter case, I would suggest Kprobe...

Yeah, after kprobes-based event tracer is supported on ftrace,
it is easy to set up IP breakpoints in the kernel.
(maybe, I need to enhance it for perfcounter.)

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/