Re: [PATCH RFC -tip 2/4] Renamings to increase RCU clarity

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Make RCU-sched, RCU-bh, and RCU-preempt be underlying implementations,
> with "RCU" defined in terms of one of the three.  Update the outdated
> rcu_qsctr_inc() names, as these functions no longer increment anything.

Sounds good, as long as RCU-sched can still be accessed directly for
tracing purpose (which seems to be the case here).

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

[...]

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/