Re: generic uaccess.h

[Michal Simek]

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2009, Michal Simek wrote:
>> I have just look at asm-generic uaccess.h and there is one thing which
>> seems to me wrong.
>>
>> For put_user macro - you use __copy_to_user but you have for 64bit case
>> ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>> but  look at fs/eventfd: eventfd_read function. At least for this
>> function(syscall) is necessary "return" 64bit
>> value on 32bit machines too.
>> IMHO that ifdef CONFIG_64BIT shouldn't be there.
>>
>> What do you think?
>> If you agree with me, I'll generate proper patch with description.
> 
> The code was intentional, because 32 bit architectures normally
> don't acces u64 values efficiently. I would expect the memcpy
> to produce better object code in that case.
> Did you see an actual bug in my version or are you only
> guessing that the assignment should work better than the
> memcpy?

I have just compile noMMU version and first bootup failed.
I miss that memcpy after it. Ooou.

I'll let you know what my results are.

Michal

> 
> What object code do you get with
> 
> int test(unsigned long long __user *out, unsigned long long in)
> {
> 	return put_user(in, ptr);
> }
> 
> in both cases?


> 
> 	Arnd <><


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/