Re: [PATCH] copy over oom_adj value at fork time

[Paul Menage]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:19 AM, KOSAKI
Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Paul, I'd like to clarily this duscussion. Doesn't Rik's patch fix your vfork issue or
> you worry about generic ABI breaking issue?
>

No, Rik's patch just fixes the lack of inheritability that David
introduced originally. It doesn't address the problem that the
intention of the patches is to disallow separate processes sharing the
same VM from having different oom_adj scores, which breaks the
previous ability to vfork() or clone(CLONE_VM) a child and set its
oom_adj to a non-disabled value prior to execve().

I think that in the case of our job scheduler, we can probably change
it to do a full fork() rather than clone(), at a little extra cost
(copying the entire mm rather than just cloning a thread). Our job
scheduler is generally a small process, so this shouldn't be too
expensive. But for large processes, the overhead of a full mm copy is
bigger.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/