Re: possible regression with pty.c commit

From: Dave Young
Date: Fri Jul 17 2009 - 09:34:26 EST


On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Sergey
Senozhatsky<sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On (07/17/09 08:51), Dave Young wrote:
>> > Âd945cb9cce20ac7143c2de8d88b187f62db99bdc "pty: Rework the pty layer to use Âthe normal buffering logic"
>> > Âand REVERTED a6540f731d506d9e82444cf0020e716613d4c46c "ppp: Fix throttling bugs"
>> >
>> > seems to work.
>>
>> I have same result, the pppoe connection is unstable with the patch.
>> Are there better solution for this issue?
>>
>
> Hello Dave.
> The solution is in rc3-git2.
> Linus has reverted "throttling" commits.
>
> git log drivers/net/ppp_async.c
> git log drivers/net/ppp_synctty.c
> 4a21b8cb3550f19f838f7c48345fbbf6a0e8536b
> Revert "ppp: Fix throttling bugs"
>
> Requested-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Â Â Â ÂSergey

Thanks for tell, and then the "scheduling in atomic" problem?

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iJwEAQECAAYFAkpgN5gACgkQfKHnntdSXjRg0wQAhef6hdvDaOXuQSsxFLH/l9H1
> 99NtAA8ewJ7Rx6/lNkzLu9n/A8qJtdoZxNP9xQDeBbeMXaH+NA5+FSo48mGbb/jp
> ePjb3vIIOzRRqGWsKYFdn0m4JW5Bw/2IvVFbHBPfa9C+ZDBPodiyDHI9gZi8bF99
> xc5uyDLAlCksK+WYu+s=
> =BLJz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>



--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/