[FIX REQUEST] x86: Remove avoidable multiple ifdef blocks

From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Date: Mon Jul 13 2009 - 03:16:08 EST


In -tip there are many instances where multiple ifdefs are used which
can be easily avoidable to make core more readable and consistent.

Like multiple 'ifdef __KERNEL__' in asm/bitops.h :

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
index 02b47a6..477f556 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -434,11 +434,6 @@ static inline int fls(int x)
#endif
return r + 1;
}
-#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-
-#undef ADDR
-
-#ifdef __KERNEL__

#include <asm-generic/bitops/sched.h>

@@ -446,12 +441,6 @@ static inline int fls(int x)

#include <asm-generic/bitops/hweight.h>

-#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-
-#include <asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h>
-
-#ifdef __KERNEL__
-
#include <asm-generic/bitops/ext2-non-atomic.h>

#define ext2_set_bit_atomic(lock, nr, addr) \
@@ -462,4 +451,9 @@ static inline int fls(int x)
#include <asm-generic/bitops/minix.h>

#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
+
+#undef ADDR
+
+#include <asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h>
+
#endif /* _ASM_X86_BITOPS_H */

Similarly in ifdef __KERNEL__ in asm/e820.h and asm/signal.h

And similarly others ifdef block.

Thanks,
--
JSR

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/