Re: [PATCH] switch free memory back to MIGRATE_MOVABLE

[Shaohua Li]

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:08:14AM +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:58:03AM +0800, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:47:46 +0900 (JST)
> > > KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > When page is back to buddy and its order is bigger than pageblock_order, we can
> > > > > switch its type to MIGRATE_MOVABLE. This can reduce fragmentation. The patch
> > > > > has obvious effect when read a block device and then drop caches.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch change hot path, but there is no performance mesurement description.
> > > > Also, I don't like modification buddy core for only drop caches.
> > > > 
> > > Li, does this patch imply fallback of migration type doesn't work well ?
> > > What is the bad case ?
> > The page is initialized as migrate_movable, and then switch to reclaimable or
> > something else when fallback occurs, but its type remains even the page gets
> > freed. When the page gets freed, its type actually can be switch back to movable,
> > this is what the patch does.
> 
> This answer is not actual answer.
> Why do you think __rmqueue_fallback() doesn't works well? Do you have
> any test-case or found a bug by review?
I never said __rmqueue_fallback() doesn't work well. The page is already freed, switching
back the pageblock to movable might make next page allocation (non-movable) skip this
pageblock. So this could potentially reduce fragmentation and improve memory offline.
But your guys are right, I have no number if this will impact performance.

Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/