Re: [PATCH v5] RO/NX protection for loadable kernel modules

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:21:46 +0930
Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 03:37:01 pm Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:54:03 pm Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > please use the customary comment style:
> >
> > Please don't.  There's one spot in that file which does it, and
> > frankly it's a distracting waste of space.
> 
> Sorry, Ingo there's more than one.  I don't bother fixing up others'
> comments in patches, so the file is now a bit mixed.  It'd be better
> to make it uniform, in which case I'd change it to kernel-style.
> 
> I have a question about this patch though: I think it's unsafe in
> general to mark the last partial page as NX (we asked for executable
> pages, this could remove executable from some unrelated allocation).
> 

we vmalloc / g_f_p modules right? so we don't share the last page.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/