Re: [tip:x86/cleanups] x86/cpu: Clean up various files a bit

[Alan Cox]

> > No code changes except printk levels (although some of the K6
> > mtrr code might be clearer if there were a few as would
> > splitting out some of the intel cache code).
> > -#include <asm/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> 
> linux/io.h should move to linux/XXX.h block

That would be a code change and potentially a behaviour change - it
should be done but as a later patch. It doesn't help that checkpatch is
buggy here and thinks some stuff is the same which is not.


> >  #if !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> > -	printk("CPU: ");
> > +	printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: ");
> >  	print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
> >  #endif
> >  	alternative_instructions();
> 
> I think, these was left intentionally otherwise dmesg output looks
> weird.

Curious. If it is meant to be a continuation it should be KERN_CONT but
that doesn't seem to be the case. No KERN_ is wrong, always.

> >  	 * All current models of Pentium and Pentium with MMX technology CPUs
> > -	 * have the F0 0F bug, which lets nonprivileged users lock up the system.
> > +	 * have the F0 0F bug, which lets nonprivileged users lock up the
> > +	 * system.
> 
> It should be non-privileged

Yes - I agree (or better yet unprivileged)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/