Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:18 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Friday 10 July 2009 06:57:56 am Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT     (1)
> 
> If the parentheses are useful or necessary, I need to be
> educated about why.  They look like superfluous paranoia to me.

They are strictly speaking superfluous, but since I already knew I'd be
adding a term I added them.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/