Re: [PATCH] sched: Move the sleeping while atomic checks early incond_resched()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 20:08 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> > Right, how about renaming these to _cond_resched_{lock,softirq}, and
> > added a __might_sleep() definition for !DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP and add
> > macro wrappers to sched.c for these two as well?
> 
> I did that first but thought that might_sleep() would fail in a spinlock
> held or softirq context, right?

Ah, right.. maybe we can add a preempt_count_offset parameter to
__might_sleep() such that it will compensate for the pending
spin_unlock()/local_bh_enable().



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/