Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: use the same failfast bits for bio and request

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Christoph.

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:45:24AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> What's more disturbing to me is the different between RQ and BIO
>> flags.  __REQ_* are bit positions, REQ_* are masks while BIO_* are bit
>> positions.  Sadly it seems it's already too late to change that.  I
>> personally an not a big fan of simple accessors or flags defined as
>> bit positions.  They seem to obscure things without much benefit.
> 
> flags as bit positions generally only make sense if you use
> test/set/clear_bit, otherwise they just confuse things.

Another shortcoming of bit position flags is masking / multi flag
operations.  It's just awful.  I think it's always better to define
flags as masks even when it's used with test/set/clear_bit().  If such
usages are common enough, we can easily add test/set/clear_bit_mask().
The conversion from mask to bit would be constant most of the time and
it's not like fls/ffs() are expensive.

> And the accessors are pretty annoying, especially in the block
> layer.  Trying to find the places where a BIO flag has an actual
> effect is pretty painful due to the mix of the different flags and
> the accessors.

Yeap, fully agreed.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/