Re: [PATCH 20/44] includecheck fix: x86, shadow.c

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 21:01 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner<tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Can we stop this kindergarden already? The patch is so obvious that it
> > > just should be applied. I'll pick up all x86 ones and fold them in.
> > 
> > What kindergarten are you talking about? Technically Ingo "kicked"
> > kmemcheck out of the x86 tree so the patch should go through
> > kmemcheck.git which makes Cyrill's CC correction spot on.
> 
> I'm referring to the fact that these changes are so obvious that we do
> neither need dozens separate commits nor the ack of everyone plus some
> more. My inbox is full enough already.
> 

Hey kindergarten kid,

What the hell you are talking about, I did not send even one email to
you.

Hey kid here is your today's lesson:

If you and your inbox is upset with x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>
emails then quit x86 maintainer-ship.

If you and your inbox is upset with LKML emails then quit LKML.

If you upset with life then ...

--
JSR

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/