Re: [PATCH 2/4] block: use the same failfast bits for bio andrequest

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Thu Jul 09 2009 - 09:38:11 EST


On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:45:24AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> What's more disturbing to me is the different between RQ and BIO
> flags. __REQ_* are bit positions, REQ_* are masks while BIO_* are bit
> positions. Sadly it seems it's already too late to change that. I
> personally an not a big fan of simple accessors or flags defined as
> bit positions. They seem to obscure things without much benefit.

flags as bit positions generally only make sense if you use
test/set/clear_bit, otherwise they just confuse things. And the
accessors are pretty annoying, especially in the block layer. Trying to
find the places where a BIO flag has an actual effect is pretty painful
due to the mix of the different flags and the accessors.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/