[PATCH] cpufreq: Unbreak build for !SMP: symlinked cpus cannot happen for !SMP

[Thomas Renninger]

Or like that:
Either all #ifdef CONFIG_SMP related conditionals to managed cpus
should vanish or all should be covered. This one takes the latter
approach.

---
'managed_policy' is used for the non-smp case in line 941.

Make the symlink code conditional to #ifdef CONFIG_SMP as already
done at other places.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>

Index: cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- cpufreq.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ cpufreq/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	/* symlink affected CPUs */
 	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
 		if (j == cpu)
@@ -947,6 +948,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct sys_de
 			goto err_out_unregister;
 		}
 	}
+#endif
 
 	policy->governor = NULL; /* to assure that the starting sequence is
 				  * run in cpufreq_set_policy */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/