Re: [PATCH 08/12] SFI, x86: hook e820() for memory map initialization

[H. Peter Anvin]

This bothers me... we keep saying that memory map initialization belongs
to the boot loader, and yet we keep doing the opposite.  This isn't just
an arbitrary difference, either: it is pretty essential to being able to
use the early range allocator safely.

	-hpa


Len Brown wrote:
> From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/e820.c |    5 +++++
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index c4ca89d..e399d0e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <linux/pfn.h>
>  #include <linux/suspend.h>
>  #include <linux/firmware-map.h>
> +#include <linux/sfi.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/page.h>
> @@ -1437,6 +1438,10 @@ char *__init default_machine_specific_memory_setup(void)
>  	  < 0) {
>  		u64 mem_size;
>  
> +		/* if SFI mmap table exists, use SFI to setup e820 mmap */
> +		if (!sfi_init_memory_map())
> +			return "SFI";
> +
>  		/* compare results from other methods and take the greater */
>  		if (boot_params.alt_mem_k
>  		    < boot_params.screen_info.ext_mem_k) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/