Re: [PATCH/RFC] sched: Remove SYSTEM_RUNNING checks fromcond_resched*()

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:10:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > That said, I do agree that maybe SYSTEM_RUNNING isn't the right check. 
> > Testing that the scheduler is initialized may be the more correct one. I 
> > think the SYSTEM_RUNNING one just comes from that being used for other 
> > debug issues.
> 
> Agreed.  system_state is too general.
> 
> If we specifically want to know whether it is safe to call schedule() then
> let's create a global boolean it_is_safe_to_call_schedule and test that,
> rather than testing something which indirectly and unreliably implies "it
> is safe to call schedule".  If that boolean already exists then no-brainer.
> 
> All that being said, I wonder if the netconsole code should be using
> msleep(1) instead.  Spinning on cond_resched() is a bit rude.  But one
> would have to verify that it is safe to call schedule() at this time, and
> for the netconsole caller, this is dubious.

What do you mean by "verify that it is safe"? If it works,
can I assume that it's safe? ;-) It works, fwiw.

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/