Re: [PATCH 19/19] PM: Add empty suspend/resume device irq functions

From: Heiko Carstens
Date: Fri Jun 12 2009 - 07:32:31 EST


On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2009-06-11 22:42:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > git commit 0a0c5168 "PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming
> > device interrupts" introduced some helper functions. However these
> > functions are only available for architectures which support
> > GENERIC_HARDIRQS.
>
> I believe architectures that do not use GENERIC_HARDIRQs should just
> provide the empty functions themselves.
>
> If we want to help them, perhaps few attribute((weak)) functions in
> the core are the way to go...

We can still do that when there actually is an architecture that doesn't
support GENERIC_HARDIRQs _and_ needs non-empty functions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/