Re: [2.6.28.x FIX] CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING should not depend onCONFIG_BLOCK

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Jun 11 2009 - 00:02:20 EST


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:07:59AM +0200, TomÃÅ SzÃpe wrote:
> > > Fix: CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING should not depend on CONFIG_BLOCK.
> > > Patch against 2.6.28.10.
> > >
> > > inlined please find a trivial fix that makes it possible to run
> > > complete systems out of an initramfs on 2.6.28.10 again (this
> > > broke somewhere between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28).
> >
> > 2.6.28 is no longer supported, sorry.
> > Is this an issue in 2.6.29 or 2.6.30?
>
> Yes. I also sent a patch (in a separate email) that applies
> on 2.6.29.x, 2.6.30.x, and current git master branch head.

Ah, ok, I see that now, sorry for getting ahead.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/