[PATCH 2/2] CPUFREQ: Mark e_powersaver driver as EXPERIMENTAL andDANGEROUS

From: Harald Welte
Date: Mon Jun 08 2009 - 06:30:08 EST


The e_powersaver driver for VIA's C7 CPU's needs to be marked as
DANGEROUS as it configures the CPU to power states that are out
of specification.

According to Centaur, all systems with C7 and Nano CPU's support
the ACPI p-state method. Thus, the acpi-cpufreq driver should
be used instead.

Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig | 9 ++++++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
index 52c8398..f138c6c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
@@ -220,11 +220,14 @@ config X86_LONGHAUL
If in doubt, say N.

config X86_E_POWERSAVER
- tristate "VIA C7 Enhanced PowerSaver"
+ tristate "VIA C7 Enhanced PowerSaver (DANGEROUS)"
select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
- depends on X86_32
+ depends on X86_32 && EXPERIMENTAL
help
- This adds the CPUFreq driver for VIA C7 processors.
+ This adds the CPUFreq driver for VIA C7 processors. However, this driver
+ does not have any safeguards to prevent operating the CPU out of spec
+ and is thus considered dangerous. Please use the regular ACPI cpufreq
+ driver, enabled by CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ.

If in doubt, say N.

--
1.6.2.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/