Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page allocator

[Pekka Enberg]

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Larry H. <research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for coming to the conclusion that unconditional memory
> sanitization is the correct approach.
>
> I thought this had been stated numerous times before in this thread. Are
> you serious about your responses or you are just clowning around? It's
> amusing, I give you that much.

So is this the same Larry that was able to have a productive and civil
discussion on #mm on IRC where he wanted me to ACK his patches? Or did
his evil identical twin take over the keyboard?

But anyway, enough is enough, and I really am not interested in this
discussion. I wish you the best of luck getting your patches merged. I
suspect you're gonna need it.

                                 Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/