Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page allocator

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi Larry,

On 10:53 Sat 30 May, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > That's hopeless, and kzfree is broken. Like I said in my earlier reply,
> > > please test that yourself to see the results. Whoever wrote that ignored
> > > how SLAB/SLUB work and if kzfree had been used somewhere in the kernel
> > > before, it should have been noticed long time ago.
> > An open-coded version of kzfree was being used in the kernel:
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=00fcf2cb6f6bb421851c3ba062c0a36760ea6e53
> >
> > Can we now get to the part where you explain how it's broken because I 
> > obviously "ignored how SLAB/SLUB works"?

Larry H. wrote:
> You can find the answer in the code of sanitize_obj, within my kfree
> patch. Besides, it would have taken less time for you to write a simple
> module that kmallocs and kzfrees a buffer, than writing these two
> emails.
>
> Consider the inuse, size, objsize and offset members of a kmem_cache
> structure, for further hints. Test the module on a system with SLUB,
> though the issue should replicate over SLAB too. And don't dare test it
> on SLOB and its wonderful ksize, or even look at the freelist pointer
> management within SLUB.

Thank you for the lesson in slab internals! That said, I did go over 
your patch and am still as confused as ever. I am afraid I have to 
consider this discussion done unless you're willing to share your 
knowledge on the subject.

			Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/