Re: [PATCH] ath5k: added initial RFKILL support

[Johannes Berg]

On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 00:33 +0200, Tobias Doerffel wrote:

> > Could you try to work against v11
> > of my rfkill patch, or better even against the cfg80211 rfkill instead?
> I didn't look at both of them yet. However I think we first should try to get 
> current rfkill support into mainline as fast as possible. Improvements and 
> adaptations to reworked rfkill framework can follow.

No other comments from me -- but since the v11 of the rfkill rewrite
will certainly hit the tree before your patch (it's almost in) you
_will_ have to work against it. I'll also try to make the cfg80211
rfkill hit the tree very soon for reasons I'll explain elsewhere -- you
would be better off working against that because then your rfkill code
is very very very simple and doesn't need to do much at all.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part