Re: [PATCH RFC] perf_counter: Don't swap contexts containinglocked mutex

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:13 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:06 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > static struct perf_counter_ctx *pin_ctx(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 *old_gen)
> > {
> > 	struct perf_counter_context *ctx;
> > 	unsigned long flags;
> > 
> > 	rcu_read_lock();
> > retry:
> > 	ctx = rcu_dereference(counter->ctx);
> > 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> > 	if (ctx != rcu_dereference(counter->ctx))
> > 		goto retry;
> > 
> > 	*old_gen = ctx->generation;
> > 	ctx->generation = ~0ULL;
> > 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
> > 	rcu_read_unlock();
> > 
> > 	return ctx;
> > }
> > 
> > static void unpin_ctx(struct perf_counter_ctx *ctx, u64 old_gen)
> > {
> > 	unsigned long flags;
> > 
> > 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> > 	ctx->generation = old_gen;
> > 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
> > }
> 
> OK, I think I got this wrong, counter->ctx isn't the problem.
> task->perf_counter_ctx is.
> 
> Still would be nice to write it in the above form. I'll go over the code
> again to see who else might want it.

OK, I went over the code, and your patch does indeed cover the few spots
we need. It was just my brain going haywire and auditing the wrong
pattern.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/