Re: [PATCH 18/38] C/R: core stuff

[Oren Laadan]

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:44:36PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx):
>>> And since you guys showed that just idea of in-kernel checkpointing is not
>>> rejected outright, it doesn't mean that you can drag every single idea too.
>> Can you rephrase here?  I have no idea what you mean by 'drag every single
>> idea'
> 
>   									complexity
>  +-|------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-->
> hypervisor C/R					in-kernel C/R	C/R for unpriviledged
> 								C/R with "leaks"
> 

c/r for unprivileged users is indeed more complex - requires more care.
Keep in mind, however, that most of that are sanity checks that we would
like to have in the code anyway.

c/r with "leaks" is actually a subset of the code that prevents leaks:
simply comment out the leak detection :)

Oren.


> I personally thought in-kernel C/R will be rejected outright, but it wasn't.
> This in theory doesn't mean other two issues should be accepted.
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/