Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform

[Robert Schwebel]

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> True. From a commercial point of view this is a huge  problem  casued
> by the device tree - custumers who used to oder a BSP from commercial
> service providers (like Robert or me :-) now often find that all they
> need  to  do is to tweak the device tree to get their system running.
> Lost business. D*mn...  [Maybe this explains Robert's reluctance?]

Wolfgang, you know me long enough to realize that this argument is
*crap*.

Talking about business cases, it has turned out to be extremely
difficult to explain customers that the effort for the actual
functionality is only a little percentage of the work necessary to do
the oftree stuff right. The functionality has often worked after a few
hours, and until all oftrees have been solved, it often takes weeks.

In result, this has already led to customers concluding that

- mainline is not worth the effort
- linux is overkill and one should better use cortex-bare-metal

However, that is only our personal observation.

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/