Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Grant Likely,

In message <fa686aa40905272029n32aa5f1ds86d07f0de4894815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
>
> Personally, I attribute a lot of that in powerpc land to the fact that
> we had no clue what we were doing when we started the process of
> porting all powerpc platforms to use the device tree.  It was hard.
> It was painful.  We didn't have much established convention to learn
> from.  However, now that it is complete I would say that it has been a
> net-win and it is now simpler to bring up new boards and SoCs than it
> ever was before.

True. From a commercial point of view this is a huge  problem  casued
by the device tree - custumers who used to oder a BSP from commercial
service providers (like Robert or me :-) now often find that all they
need  to  do is to tweak the device tree to get their system running.
Lost business. D*mn...  [Maybe this explains Robert's reluctance?]

But as stated before:  from the engineering point of view it's a real
big win now.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@xxxxxxx
Ever try. Ever fail. No matter. Try again. Fail again.  Fail  better.
                                                        -- S. Beckett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/