Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 13:28 Wed 27 May     , David Miller wrote:
> From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:39:27 +0200
> 
> > when you have to support the same driver for non OF and OF platform it's
> > really a pain in the ass
> 
> We could embed the platform_device object into the of_platform_device
> structure, it's just an implementation issue.
> 
> But more to the point, I can tell you that anything platform_device
> does can be implemented in terms of of_platform_device but the
> opposite is not true.
This is one of the problem I face not so long ago when I want to the boot
count limit functionnality which is only availlble for of platform

That's why I think having a simplest way to have driver availlable on the
twice platform is important. It will be a win-win at the end

Best Regards,
J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/