Re: [PATCH] async: make sure independent async domains can'taccidentally entangle.

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Sun, 24 May 2009 13:50:43 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 09:29 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The problem occurs when async_synchronize_full_domain() is called
> > when the async_pending list is not empty.  This will cause
> > lowest_running() to return the cookie of the first entry on the
> > async_pending list, which might be nothing at all to do with the
> > domain being asked for and thus cause the domain synchronization to
> > wait for an unrelated domain.   This can cause a deadlock if domain
> > synchronization is used from one domain to wait for another.
> > 
> > Fix by running over the async_pending list to see if any pending
> > items actually belong to our domain (and return their cookies if
> > they do).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley
> > <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> OK, so that version locked up under testing ... this version doesn't
> --- I think the phrase "MUST be called with the lock held!" was
> supposed to be some sort of clue ...

there's not many comments there.. but the ones that exist do mean
something ;-)

I'll craft this patch into your original description and send it to
Linus to see if he'll take it for .30, otherwise it'll go for .31


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/