[patch 39/51] NFS: Fix the notifications when renaming onto an existing file

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu May 14 2009 - 18:56:47 EST


2.6.29-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit b1e4adf4ea41bb8b5a7bfc1a7001f137e65495df upstream.

NFS appears to be returning an unnecessary "delete" notification when
we're doing an atomic rename. See

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575684

The fix is to get rid of the redundant call to d_delete().

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
fs/nfs/dir.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1624,8 +1624,7 @@ static int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_
} else if (atomic_read(&new_dentry->d_count) > 1)
/* dentry still busy? */
goto out;
- } else
- nfs_drop_nlink(new_inode);
+ }

go_ahead:
/*
@@ -1638,10 +1637,8 @@ go_ahead:
}
nfs_inode_return_delegation(old_inode);

- if (new_inode != NULL) {
+ if (new_inode != NULL)
nfs_inode_return_delegation(new_inode);
- d_delete(new_dentry);
- }

error = NFS_PROTO(old_dir)->rename(old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name,
new_dir, &new_dentry->d_name);
@@ -1650,6 +1647,8 @@ out:
if (rehash)
d_rehash(rehash);
if (!error) {
+ if (new_inode != NULL)
+ nfs_drop_nlink(new_inode);
d_move(old_dentry, new_dentry);
nfs_set_verifier(new_dentry,
nfs_save_change_attribute(new_dir));


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/