Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Saving power by cpuevacuationsched_max_capacity_pct=n

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed May 13 2009 - 09:48:19 EST


On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 19:15 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> [2009-05-13 15:14:57]:
>
> > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:41 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > > * Peter Zijlstra wanted more justifications for throttling at the core
> > > level. Throttling may be a resource management problem rather than
> > > scheduler/load balancer
> >
> > No, I mandate that it be thermal management. Any other reason and you've
> > got a NAK.
>
> We've been discussing hard limits from the resource management view
> point. Bharata is working on a RFC that we should be able to share
> soon

Right, and you well know I dislike them.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/