Re: [tip:irq/numa] x86: read apic ID in the !acpi_lapic case

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed May 13 2009 - 09:14:56 EST



* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> - return hard_smp_processor_id() >> index_msb;
> + return initial_apic_id >> index_msb;

> - unsigned apicid = hard_smp_processor_id();
> + unsigned apicid = cpu_has_apic ? hard_smp_processor_id() : c->apicid;

> - int apicid = hard_smp_processor_id();
> + int apicid = cpu_has_apic ? hard_smp_processor_id() : c->apicid;

Doesnt such a pattern call for the pushing of that distinction into
hard_smp_processor_id() instead? (after a careful review of all
hard_smp_processor_id() call-sites)

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/